Category | Frame Ups

James Ujaama – not a terrorist!

Posted on 05 January 2010


Once again, James Ujaama never killed any civilians in any terrorist attacks, nor was he implicated in any particular atrocities. The only alleged evidence they have against him is the alleged fact that he wanted to set up a military type camp. However, neither him or Hamza Al Masri were involved in inciting any particular acts of terror or violence against non-combatants. Muslims should fight to have him released since he wasn’t ever a real terrorist. When will the Muslims unite in freeing up their brothers who are locked up in British, American, Canadian, and Australian prisons for often fabricated and fabricated terrorist charges?

James Ujaama
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Earnest James Ujaama (born 1966) is a convicted felon who was found guilty of supporting al-Qaeda.
[edit]Biography

Born in Denver, Colorado as James Thompson, he moved with his family to Seattle at the age of 5. He converted to Islam and changed his name to Ujaama. Washington state lawmakers declared June 10, 1994 James Ujaama Day for his community service [3], Certificate of Special Congressional Recognition from Senator Harry Reid, a key to the City of Las Vegas[4], was honored by KCPQ13 as a “Special Person”. While traveling in England in 1999, he had meetings with Abu Hamza al-Masri, a radical Muslim cleric. Ujaama also traveled to Afghanistan in 1999 to study Sharia and offer his support to al-Qaeda, according to family friends.
Ujaama was arrested in Denver on July 22, 2002 as a material witness. He was transferred to a hospital in Virginia around July 29, and held there with restricted access to family or counsel until an indictment for providing material resources to al-Qaeda was returned against him in Seattle. These charges included attempting to create a camp for training terrorists near Bly, Oregon between October and December 1999.
In April 2003, the government dropped those charges and filed a complaint accusing Ujaama of providing money, computer equipment and women to Taliban officials in Afghanistan.[citation needed] In February of the following year, Ujaama pled guilty in a plea bargain: in return for a two year sentence, he would provide information for ongoing terrorism investigations—especially for what he knew about al-Masri, whose Web site Ujaama once ran.
Federal officials have said Ujaama’s help was useful in the 2004 indictment of al-Masri on charges of trying to establish the training camp in Bly, Oregon.[1]
In December 2006, Ujaama was once again arrested in Belize after violating parole in the United States [2]. He possessed a fake Mexican passport at the time of his apprehension. [1]
On August 13, 2007, Ujaama pled guilty to charges of raising money for terrorism and for attempting to set up training camps.[3]
[edit]References

^ a b [1]
^ [2]
^ Man pleads guilty to terror camp charges
[edit]Further reading
Book on James Ujaama

Frame Ups Post 9-11

Posted on 14 October 2009


Source: Muslims for a Safer America 

The FBI warns that there are hundreds of people with ties to Al Qaeda in the U.S. It is unknown how many are American Muslims.

No American Muslims were among the 9/11 hijackers, presumably because Al Qaeda could not find American Muslims willing to participate.

However, several American Muslims have been accused of working with Al Qaeda or the Taliban since 9/11. Some have been convicted. Cases like these tend to cast suspicion on all Muslims. They help to explain why some Americans fear their American Muslim neighbors.

The following is a partial list of cases that are currently pending against American Muslims, and cases involving convictions of American Muslims. This list does not include cases involving non-citizens, unless they are implicated in cases involving citizens. (The Washington Post reported that, as of June 2005, fourteen people had been convicted of terrorism/national security crimes related to Al Qaeda, and that five people had been convicted of terrorism/national security crimes related to the Taliban. However, The Washington Post did not state how many were Americans. See “Narrowing The Field.”)

Allegations of Threats to the American Homeland

In May 2003, a Kashmiri-American Muslim from Ohio, Iyman Faris, pled guilty to scouting targets, like the Brooklyn Bridge, for Al Qaeda, and providing Al Qaeda with sleeping bags, cell phones, and plane tickets. He admitted to meeting with Osama Bin Ladin. He also admitted to meeting with Khalid Shaikh Mohammed after 9/11.

In October 2004, an Egyptian-American Muslim in NY, James Elshafay, pled guilty to conspiring to blow up a NY subway station. A Pakistani Muslim immigrant, Shahawar Matin Siraj, was found guilty in the plot in May 2006. Police paid an Egyptian-American Muslim informant, Osama Eldawoody, $100,000 to watch the local community. The informant offered to provide the Defendants with explosives for the subway attack. The informant videotaped the Defendants talking about blowing up the subway station. The Defendants said the informant suggested the plot and incited them to act by showing them pictures of Muslims overseas being mistreated and by telling them he had received a fatwa saying it was okay for Muslims to kill American troops.

In November 2005, a Jordanian-American Muslim from Virginia, Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, was convicted of conspiring with Al Qaeda to assassinate President Bush and to hijack planes and fly them into buildings. He was also convicted of providing material support to Al Qaeda. He confessed on videotape while in Saudi custody, but he claimed the confession was produced by torture.

In March 2006, an Iranian-American Muslim in North Carolina, Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, was charged with attempted murder and felony assault after he attempted to run people over with an SUV. Nine people were injured. He wrote a letter to the media saying, “Allah gives permission in the Koran for the followers of Allah to attack those who have raged war against them, with the expectation of eternal paradise in case of martyrdom and/or living one’s life in obedience of all of Allah’s commandments found throughout the Quran’s 114 chapters.” He also wrote, “The U.S. government is responsible for the deaths of and the torture of countless followers of Allah, my brothers and sisters. My attack on Americans at UNC-CH on March 3rd was in retaliation for similar attacks orchestrated by the U.S. government on my fellow followers of Allah in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and other Islamic territories. I did not act out of hatred for Americans, but out of love for Allah instead.”

In April 2006, a Pakistani-American Muslim from Lodi, California, Hamid Hayat, was convicted of providing material support to terrorists by attending a terrorist training camp in Pakistan in 2003. The government paid a Pakistani Muslim informant, Naseem Khan, around $225,000 to move to Lodi and infiltrate the Muslim community; the informant encouraged Hayat to talk about fighting America, encouraged Hayat to attend a terrorist training camp, and cursed at Hayat when Hayat said he hadn’t yet attended the camp. The government claimed Hayat admitted during an FBI interrogation that he trained to kill Americans; that he received training in weapons, explosives, and hand-to-hand combat; and that he volunteered to attack American hospitals and food stores. The FBI said no actual attack had been planned. Hayat later denied that he went to a training camp, and the defense argued that the FBI had suggested answers to Hayat during the interrogation. The government also deported a Pakistani imam from Lodi for immigration violations; the government said it had been watching the imam for years based on suspicions that he was trying to organize a terrorist training camp near Lodi. No criminal charges were brought against the imam.

In July 2006, a Pakistani-American Muslim from Georgia, Syed Haris Ahmed, and a Bangladeshi-American Muslim from Georgia, Ehsanul Islam Sadequee, were charged with getting paramilitary training in Georgia in order to attack civilian and government targets, and discussing terror targets with others. The indictment says their motivation was “defense of Muslims or retaliation for acts committed against Muslims.”

In July 2006, during the Israel-Hezbollah-Lebanon War, a Pakistani-American Muslim from Pasco, Washington, Naveed Haq, was charged with killing a Jewish woman at a Jewish center in Seattle. Officials said the gunman was angry about Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon.

In June 2007, a Guyanese-American Muslim, Russell Defreitas, and three Muslim non-citizens, were charged with conspiring to attack JFK Airport by setting off explosives near the airport’s fuel lines. A convicted drug dealer agreed to infiltrate and record the group in exchange for a lighter sentence and financial assistance.

In November 2007, an African-American Muslim, Derrick Shareef, pled guilty to plotting to attack a Rockford, IL shopping mall with hand grenades. Shareef had a White Muslim accomplice, William Chrisman, who was working as an FBI informant. Both men allegedly videotaped their wills. On the video, Shareef allegedly said, “This is a warning to those who disbelieve, that we are here for you and I am ready to give my life” and “This tape is to let you guys know, who disbelieve in Allah, to let the enemies of Islam know, and to let the Muslims alike know that the time for jihad is now.” In court, the informant, Chrisman, testified, “What brought me to the government was after 9-11 Muslim scholars in Saudi Arabia and Morocco said it was incumbent on Muslims to stop terrorists” and “Anyone involved in terrorism was deemed the brother of the devil.”

In December 2007, an African-American Muslim, LeVar Haley Washington, pled guilty to plotting attacks on National Guard facilities, synagogues, and the Israeli Consulate in Los Angeles. Two other African-American Muslims, Kevin James and Gregory Vernon Patterson, and a Pakistani Muslim, Hammad Riaz Samana, still face charges.

In June 2008, an African-American Muslim in Ohio, Christopher Paul pled guilty to plotting to bomb American targets in the U.S. and overseas. He admitted to joining Al Qaeda, receiving explosives training, and then training other Al Qaeda members in explosives.

In December 2008, a Jordanian-American Muslim from New Jersey, Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer, was convicted of plotting to kill U.S. soldiers at Fort Dix (where troops train for missions in Iraq and Afghanistan) in New Jersey. Four Muslim non-citizens from Turkey and the former Yugoslavia were also convicted. The government said they were arrested while trying to buy weapons. Two paid informants infiltrated the group, encouraged the men with anti-American rhetoric, offered to connect the group to an arms dealer, and recorded the group’s conversations.

In January 2009, a Peruvian/Argentine-American Muslim from Long Island, New York, Bryant Neal Vinas, pled guilty to providing Al Qaeda with information that might result in an attack on the Long Island Rail Road, receiving Qaeda training, and conspiring to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan. “I consulted with a senior Al Qaeda leader and provided detailed information about the operation of the Long Island Rail Road system which I knew because I had ridden the railroad on many occasions,” he told the judge. “The purpose of providing this information was to help plan a bomb attack of the Long Island Rail Road system.”

In May 2009, three African-American Muslims and one Haitian Muslim from New York – James Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams, and Laguerre Payen – were charged with plotting to bomb two NY synagogues and shoot down military planes in NY with anti-aircraft missiles. The men were arrested after allegedly planting what they believed to be bombs in cars outside two synagogues. The men had obtained the “bombs” with the help of an FBI informant, Shahed Hussain, a Pakistani Muslim. The Muslim informant claimed that Cromitie said he was upset about the war in Afghanistan and that that he wanted to “do something to America.” The Muslim informant became an informant to avoid being deported, after he was convicted of fraud.

In June 2009, a Pakistani-American Muslim from Georgia, Syed Haris Ahmed, was convicted of aiding terrorist groups by making videos of potential targets – including the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol building – and sending the videos to a recruiter for Al Qaeda overseas. In August 2009, a Bangladeshi-American Muslim from Georgia, Ehsanul Islam Sadequee, was convicted of the same thing. One of the videos played in court showed Ahmed and Sadequee driving by the Pentagon as Sadequee said, “This is where our brothers attacked the Pentagon.” Ahmed testified that he and Sadequee talked about attacking U.S. oil refineries to disrupt the U.S. economy. A friend, Omer Kamal, testified that he watched jihad recruitment videos, and videos on making explosives, with Sadequee and Ahmed, and that they practiced together for warfare by playing paintball. Kamal testified that they also talked about attacking the White House and the U.S. Capitol.

In September 2009, a White American Muslim from Illinois, Michael Finton, was charged with trying to blow up the federal courthouse in Springfield, Illinois. The government initially learned that Finton wanted to get training to fight Israelis in Gaza. Another Muslim, working as a government informant, and an undercover FBI agent, posing as an Al Qaeda operative, suggested that Finton attack an American government target instead; Finton allegedly agreed. The undercover FBI agent provided Finton with a van with a fake bomb inside. The government alleged that Finton parked the van outside the courthouse, and that he twice tried to detonate the fake bomb by making cell phone calls that he thought would activate the fake bomb.

Allegations of Assisting Al Qaeda, The Taliban, And Other Groups Overseas

In July 2002, a Caucasian-American Muslim, John Walker Lindh, pled guilty to joining the Taliban. When Lindh joined the Taliban in Summer 2001 to fight against Afghan opponents of the Taliban, the Bush Administration was providing economic assistance to the Taliban to assist with opium eradication. Lindh was in Afghanistan on 9/11, but he said he had never heard of Al Qaeda, was not aware that Al Qaeda had attacked America, and did not know that America had declared war on the Taliban. At the sentencing hearing after Lindh’s guilty plea, the federal judge stated that there was “no evidence” that Lindh fought against Americans.

In early 2003, six Yemeni-American Muslims in Lackawanna, NY (Yasein Taher, Shafal Mosed, Mukhtar al-Bakri, Sahim Alwan, Yahya Goba, and Faysal Galab) pled guilty to training at an Al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan before 9/11. The men said they went to the camp to learn how to use weapons. At the camp, they met with Osama Bin Ladin and learned that some sort of attack against the U.S. was planned. But the men said they themselves never intended to attack American targets. The government described the men as a “sleeper cell,” but the government made no allegations that they planned any attacks in the U.S. or elsewhere.

In April 2003, an African-American Muslim in Seattle, WA, James Ujaama, pled guilty to traveling to Afghanistan and providing the Taliban with money and computer software prior to 9/11. Charges that he plotted to establish a terrorist training camp in Bly, Oregon were dropped as part of a plea agreement. He agreed to cooperate with the government in a case against Abu Hamza al-Masri, former imam of the Finsbury Mosque in London.

In the summer and fall of 2003, members of the “Portland Seven” (Patrice Lumumba Ford, Jeffrey Leon Battle, October Martinique Lewis, Muhammad Bilal, Ahmed Bilal, and Maher Mike Hawash) were convicted of planning to join the Taliban and fight the U.S. in Afghanistan after 9/11. The Palestinian-American and African-American Muslims got as far as China, before being denied entry into Pakistan. One of them told the judge he wanted to join the Taliban, because he was concerned that American troops in Afghanistan would kill Muslims who had already suffered enough.

In March 2004, a Pakistani-American Muslim from Maryland, Masoud Ahmad Khan, was convicted of conspiring to join the Taliban to fight against the U.S. in Afghanistan after 9/11. He was part of the so-called “Virginia Paintball Jihad” group. Six other American Muslims of various national origins (and four other immigrant Muslims) were convicted on charges unrelated to attacks on Americans. Some of the defendants admitted in court that they had intended to fight U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

In March 2004, an Indian-American Muslim in California, Ilyas Ali, pled guilty to attempting in 2002 to buy four Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, which he intended to sell to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Two Pakistani citizens also pled guilty.

In June 2004, a Pakistani-American Muslim from NY, Mohammed Junaid Babar, pled guilty to conspiring to send money and military gear to Al-Qaeda agents fighting U.S. forces in Afghanistan, and to setting up a training camp in Afghanistan.

In July 2005, an Arab-American Muslim, Ali al-Timimi, was convicted in Virginia of encouraging his students to attend training camps and join the Taliban to fight the U.S. after 9/11.

In February 2006, the government charged two Jordanian-American Muslims, and a Lebanese Muslim with a green card, from Ohio with plotting to provide support for attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq and other countries. One of the Jordanian-American Muslims was also charged with threatening to attack President Bush.

In May 2006, the government charged a Pakistani-American Muslim formerly from NY, Syed Hashmi, with conspiring to send money and military gear to Al-Qaeda agents fighting U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

In October 2006, a Caucasian-American Muslim originally from California, Adam Gadahn, was charged with treason for providing support to Al Qaeda. The government alleges that he has met with Osama Bin Ladin and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and helped give them insight into the West. The government alleges that he has helped produce, and has appeared in, videos promoting Al Qaeda.

In December 2006, an African-American Muslim from Texas, Kobie Williams, pled guilty to getting paramilitary training with three Pakistani Muslim friends in Houston so he could prepare to join the Taliban and fight against U.S. troops in Afghanistan; he also pled guilty to donating $350 to the Taliban. A White American Muslim who was an ICNA-Houston member, Jim Coates, made recordings of the men for the FBI. Coates helped an undercover officer, Malik Mohamed, infiltrate the group; Mohamed agreed to be their paramilitary trainer and recorded their conversations.

In March 2007, an African-American Muslim, Hassan Abujihaad, formerly known as Paul R. Hall, was charged with informing Al Qaeda sympathizers about how and where to attack U.S. Navy vessels in the Middle East during the spring of 2001, a few months after the USS Cole was attacked in Yemen. He was a sailor in the U.S. Navy at the time.

In April 2007, an African-American Muslim in NY, Tariq Shah, pled guilty to pledging allegiance to Al Qaeda and offering to train Al Qaeda members in martial arts and hand-to-hand combat. The government taped conversations that Shah had with an undercover FBI agent, Ali Soufan, posing as an Al Qaeda recruiter, and a Yemeni Muslim, Mohamed Alanssi, working as an FBI informant. The government paid the informant $100,000. As a result of the sting operation, two other Muslims from NY and Washington, D.C. also pled guilty to providing material support to Al Qaeda.

In May 2007, an African-American Muslim from Florida, Dr. Rafiq Abdus Sabir, was convicted of agreeing to treat injured Al Qaeda fighters so they could return to Iraq to battle Americans. The government taped conversations that Abdus Sabir had with an undercover FBI agent, Ali Soufan, posing as an Al Qaeda recruiter.

In August 2007, a Latino-American Muslim, Jose Padilla, and a Jordanian-American Muslim, Kifah Jayyousi, were convicted of conspiring to murder, kidnap and maim overseas, and providing material support for terrorists. (Padilla had previously been held for three-and-a-half years as an enemy combatant, because the government alleged he plotted with Al Qaeda to detonate a bomb containing radioactive material in the U.S., and to blow up American apartment buildings. However, these allegations were not included in the criminal charges. Padilla’s lawyers charged that during his detention, Padilla was deprived of sleep, chained in painful positions, and injected with mind-altering drugs, making him unable to participate in his own defense at trial; he did not testify at his trial.)

In March 2008, an African-American Muslim from Arizona, Hassan Abujihaad, formerly known as Paul R. Hall, was convicted of informing Al Qaeda sympathizers about the movements of U.S. Navy vessels in the Middle East during the spring of 2001, after the USS Cole was attacked in Yemen. He was a sailor in the U.S. Navy in 2001.

In June 2008, two Jordanian-American Muslims from Ohio, Mohammad Amawi and Marwan El-Hindi, were convicted of plotting attacks against American soldiers in Iraq. A Lebanese Muslim on a green card, Wassim Mazloum, was also convicted.

In January 2009, two Egyptian-American Muslims from Chicago, Khaleel Ahmed and Zubair A. Ahmed, pled guilty to conspiring to attack American troops in Iraq.

Men Accused in Embassy Bombings Deny Involvement

Posted on 06 February 2009


Embassy bombings trial informant names alleged conspirators

Edith (left) and Sue Bartley
Edith Bartley (left) and Sue Bartley arrive at the U.S. District Court in New York on Tuesday. Two members of their family were killed in the embassy attacks in Kenya and Tanzania

WEB EXCLUSIVE

February 6, 2001
Web posted at: 8:55 p.m. EST (0155 GMT)

From CNN Producer Phil Hirschkorn

NEW YORK (CNN) — Citing by name alleged conspirators, a former terrorist Tuesday described the formation of Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden’s organization, al-Qaeda, which federal prosecutors say planned acts of violence and terrorism against Americans worldwide.

The government informant, Jamal Ahmed Mohamed Al-Fadl, was the first witness in the trial of four men accused of conspiracy in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa. Al-Fadl said he heard bin Laden express anti-American views when he was associated with his group.

“We have to stop the head of the snake,” Al-Fadl recalled bin Laden saying in 1993. “The snake is America and we have to stop them. We have to cut their head off and stop what they are doing in the Horn of Africa.”

Bin Laden’s first anti-American fatwah, or religious declaration, came at one of his weekly lectures sometime after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, and U.S troops were stationed in Saudi Arabia, home of the two holiest Muslim shrines in Mecca and Medina.

graphic CASE FILE

Shattered Diplomacy: The U.S. Embassy Bombings Trial
An in-depth special report on the trial of four men charged with the embassy bombings
Trial reports | Timeline | Key Figures

graphic MESSAGE BOARD

Embassy bombing trial

LEGAL RESOURCES

Latest Legal News

Law Library

FindLaw Consumer Center

“We cannot let the American army stay in the Gulf area and take our oil and take our money. We have to do something to take them out,” Al-Fadl recalled bin Laden as saying.

Al-Fadl placed one of the trial defendants, Wadih el Hage, at the al-Qaeda headquarters in Sudan in the early 1990s, and placed himself in the rooms when bin Laden and his associates issued their first declarations of violence against the United States.

Al-Fadl said he first met bin Laden between 1988-89, when Al-Fadl, a 37-year-old native of Sudan, went to Afghanistan to join rebels fighting the Soviet Union, which had occupied the Muslim country.

Bin Laden is a key figure in this trial because prosecutors allege the four defendants were acting at his behest as part of a decade-long conspiracy to kill Americans and destroy U.S. government property.

Bin Laden, also indicted by the U.S. government, is believed to be living in Afghanistan.

Al-Fadl testified that he attended meetings in 1989-90 where bin Laden and others founded al-Qaeda. Asked by prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald about the agenda of the new group, Al-Fadl said, “It’s established for focusing on jihad,” a declaration of a holy war.

Al-Fadl testified in English, at times calling on an Arabic translator for help.

In 1991, Al-Fadl said he moved with bin Laden to Sudan, where al-Qaeda established a new headquarters, including a farm used in part for military training. He said he earned $300 a month for his al-Qaeda work and $200 a month working for construction and import-export companies bin Laden established.

Al-Fadl, in listing numerous people around the offices, named el Hage, known then by the alias “Abu Abdullah al Lubani,” as on the payroll and as someone he had trained to do his job.

Bin Laden, at this time, Al-Fadl testified, began to express anti-American views.

“He liked to sit in the front yard and talk about jihad,” Al-Fadl said.

Al-Fadl said the group’s fatwahs, issued by bin Laden and others, did condone the killing of innocents, starting with al-Qaeda’s reaction to U.S. military presence in Somalia in 1993.

The indictment alleges that al-Qaeda’s forces were responsible for October 1993 attacks that killed American military personnel in Mogadishu, Somalia.

Until now, Al-Fadl, one of the government’s primary confidential sources, was known only as “CS-1″ in court documents.

Sketch artists were forbidden from drawing his face, and U.S. marshals checked their work as they left the heavily guarded courtroom. No cameras are allowed in federal court.

Prosecutors on Monday characterized this key witness as someone who approached the U.S. government after a fallout with bin Laden over money. Al-Fadl, described as on the run from bin Laden, has pleaded guilty to terrorism charges, including conspiring to attack U.S. national defense facilities, according to court documents.

courtroom
Prosecutor Butler, right, and defendants, seated from right: Odeh, al-’Owahli, Mohamed, and el Hage

The trial, presided over by U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand, kicked off with opening statements Monday. Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Butler said jurors would learn of a “long, complicated and chilling” story of conspiracy and terror involving the four defendants.

The August 7, 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya killed 224 people, including 12 Americans, and injured thousands.

By the end of the day Al-Fadl cited 10 of the alleged conspirators named in the sweeping federal indictment, most of whom are not on trial at this time.

Jeremy Schneider, an attorney for one of the two defendants facing the death penalty, Kahlfan Khamis Mohamed, conceded Monday his client had a role in the Tanzania bombing, but said he was a “pawn.”

Attorneys for the other death eligible defendant, Mohamed Rashed Daoud al-’Owhali, did not make an opening statement. “There’s always a strategy to it, but now unfortunately I can’t tell you what it is,” attorney David Baugh said Tuesday.

The other two defendants — Mohamed Sadeek Odeh and el Hage — face life sentences. Their attorneys said in their openings that the men had ties to bin Laden, but had no role in violent activity.

Al-Fadl, the first witness, told the court he lived in Saudi Arabia before coming to the United States in 1986 on a student visa. He settled in Brooklyn where he worked in a grocery store and became involved with a Brooklyn mosque that raised money and recruited Muslim men to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Court resumes Wednesday at 10 a.m. and Al-Fadl is expected to continue with his testimony.

8 Muslim Men Vindicated on Fabricated Terrorism Charges

Posted on 09 September 2008


Liquid Bomb “Terror Plot” Collapses In Court
None of suspects charged with headline-grabbing plan to blow up airlines, alleged ringleader completely acquitted

Paul Joseph Watson
Propaganda Matrix
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
StumbleUpon

The much vaunted liquid bomb “terror plot” that provoked paranoid airport security measures, an overnight change in baggage procedures, and at one point led to mothers having to drink their own breast milk, completely collapsed yesterday in court after the alleged ringleader was completely acquitted and none of the other suspects were charged with conspiracy to blow up an airliner.

“Seven men admitted plotting to cause a public nuisance. An eighth man was cleared at Woolwich Crown Court,” reports the BBC.

“But after more than 50 hours of deliberations, the jury did not find any of the defendants guilty of conspiring to target aircraft.”

“Mohammad Gulzar, 27, who Scotland Yard accused of being a ringleader in the plot, was cleared of all offenses,” adds the Register.

Despite the fact that all the suspects were cleared of charges of targeting aircraft, some quarters of the media are still bizarrely citing the verdicts as a reason to continue the inane and pointless restrictions on liquids in carry-on luggage.

Numerous airliners as well as Britain’s largest airport owner are now calling on the government to repeal the measures.

“We would expect the government to review its security regulations following the outcome of this case,” said Roger Wiltshire, chief executive of the British Air Transport Association, whose members include BA and Virgin, reports the Guardian.

BAA, the owner of Britain’s top three airports, including Heathrow, said: “Today’s verdict seems like a good opportunity for the government to consider the security measures currently in place at British airports.”

Whether the government will cave in to pressure and reverse their much cherished behavior compliance airport security measures remains to be seen, but the fact that the “liquid terror plot” was a complete fabrication became apparent from the very start.

In every single major terror bust or terror alert we have proven the evidence to be flawed and the charges to be cooked up nonsense aimed at prolonging the illusion that terror cells are lurking around every corner waiting to cause mayhem. The geopolitical agenda of the U.S., Britain and Israel depends on the proliferation phony terror threats in order to continue the farcical war on terror and take more of our innate freedoms at home to stifle dissent against the plot for worldwide hegemony.

In a series of reports following the August 10th scare, we traced the source of the alleged attack plot to Pakistani and British intelligence and were rapidly able to confirm that the story was nothing more than a manufactured ploy to frighten travelers at the height of the holiday season.

The reason being cited for the failure to convict the suspects of being behind a plot to blow up airliners is that the U.S. government wanted the men apprehended before MI5 were able to collect all the evidence against them.

In reality, as we reported at the time, an MI5 spy had infiltrated the group at an early stage which is often the case when agent provocateurs are attempting to radicalize a group and provoke them into committing acts of violence.

The announcement of the foiled plot was made on August 10th, but officials stated that they wanted to wait at least another week before busting the group, meaning August 17th or thereafter. According to the very timescale of the plot put forward by authorities, the attack was scheduled for August 16th, meaning authorities only wanted to bust the group after the attack had taken place.

Evidence that the suspects identified were mere patsies in a wider conspiracy became clear when it emerged that they didn’t even have passports and could not have boarded a transatlantic plane.

Echoing the activities of the 7/7 bombers, some of the main suspects in the case exhibited behavior that in no way suggested they were preparing to launch mid-air suicide attacks on jumbo jets. Far from preparing his last will and testament, psyching himself up for his imminent death or acquiring the necessary materials to conduct the operation, Tayib Rauf was caught on CCTV hours before the launch of the plot doing something far more mundane – he was buying cakes for his father’s confectionary business.

Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray slammed the so-called foiled plot story as “propaganda” on behalf of Bush and Blair who yearn for a “new 9/11″ to reinvigorate their flagging support base.

“None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn’t be a plane bomber for quite some time,” said Murray.

The embarrassing collapse of another government-concocted terror fairytale should immediately mandate the repeal of ridiculous measures in airports that do nothing to stop would-be terrorists and everything to hassle and inconvenience innocent travelers – but don’t expect the authorities to give up a key aspect of their prototype police state without a fight.

Canadian Government Badly Frames Muslims to Make Jews Happy

Posted on 13 June 2008


Zakaria Amara’s Speech PDF Print E-mail
Written by Zakaria Amara
FRIDAY, 13 JUNE 2008 20:46

Source: Zakaria Amara – 13-jun-08

In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Compassionate

Bismillahir Rahman Nir raheem

Two years have passed since my arrest. When I was taken to Maplehurst I was held in the custody of the Institutional Crisis Intervention Team. Whenever I was moved from place to place, they would force me to run with my hands and legs shacked while my back was bent at 90 degrees forward.

When I was first brought to cell 1 unit 1K, I was slammed face first on the floor, a huge shield was then pressed against my back while a guard smeared my face with his boots because I dared lift my head

Whenever I was moved out of my cell, I was required to slide my hands through the hatch of the door, before it was opened in order to be hand cuffed. To do this I had to kneel on both knees. Many times when I put my hands through the hatch, the guards would forcefully pull my wrists so that my forehead would slam against the metal door.

Whenever the guards came in to collect the garbage they would often apply wrestling manoeuvres on me for the purpose of entertaining themselves. They would sometimes apply pressure on sensitive areas such as my temple and fingers. One day when I came back from court, a guard twisted my hands above my head forcing me to skip on one foot back to my cell.

Since then I have languished in solitary confinement, where for the first year on a daily basis, I spent 23 hours and 40 minutes in a cell no bigger than an apartment’s washroom.

The 23 hours and 40 minutes became a complete 24 hours when I was transferred to the Don Jail. Since then, I have seen the sun less than 10 times and have gone to the exercise yard less than 30 times.

My health, psychologically and physically is deteriorating. I was planning to testify at my trial but now I am not even sure if I will be mentally capable of doing so by the time it comes around, if it ever does.

As for the state of this so called Judicial Process, then I must admit I was naïve. I came in two years ago with the expectation of transparency only to be confronted with section 38, complete denial of CSIS disclosure, censorship of vital information in the so-called RCMP disclosure, and the concealing of state agents identities which by law must be revealed as opposed to informants whose identities are protected.

To expect the accused to mount an adequate defence in the face of such barriers, in a case which is political and state entrapment is a live issue, is to expect a frail old man to defend himself with his hands tied behind and eyes blindfolded, against a professional boxer.

I am not being subjective. I realize that all government agencies have secrets that must be protected. However, authorities have in the past used ‘ National Security’ to cover up their dirty work, exculpatory evidence and embarrassing facts. The Maher Arar case is a classic example.

Last year, I was denied the freedom to mix with the other human beings due to the dreamed up danger that I could somehow pose or communicate from within a six-cell block, monitored physically by correctional officers as well as virtually by closed circuit cameras, within a maximum security prison.

During about the same time, I conceded committal to trial for the exchange of having the opportunity to cross-examine a list of witnesses agreed upon by the crown. Both parties signed this agreement yet somehow, we are to believe, there was some alleged ambiguity that allowed the crown to file a direct indictment and effectively breach its undertaking. Now I am in a difficult position of having to cross-examine the main witness in my case, for the first time, at trial.

The unfair manoeuvre has also effectively robbed me of the ability to discover my case, which is a fundamental necessity for developing my defence. This is not an alleged bank robbery or a drug bust. The stakes for the government and the authorities are high thus making the potential for corruption and malice equally high if not higher.

During the adult preliminary, Mr. Bond used to monitor our eye blinks in the prisoner box to ensure that we were not violating the communication ban. While he was busy doing that, his star witness Mubin Shiekh was slaughtering the publication ban on National and international airwaves.

The crown held and is still holding the accused on various charges based on the desire to exaggerate this case and in order to hamper their bail chances and not on the merits of evidence.

These are only some of the main issues that I have. They may very well be supported by law, but at the end of the day, they remain unfair to any mind endowed with the faculty of reason and understanding. As St. Augustine said “An unjust law is no law at all”.

I never asked anyone to believe that I was innocent. All I ever asked for was a chance to prove it. After two years, I have come to realize that even this simple request is too much to expect from this process.

In conclusion, to continue to respect such a process is an insult to my dignity, the very little intellect that I have and my faith.

I will God willing, continue to defend myself through my lawyers, and I will continue to obey orders made by the court with the exception of the order to show it respect since I can’t be expected to give what I no longer have. This, in effect, means that I will no longer stand up for any judge as he/she enters and leaves the courtroom.

Based of the rhythm of the past two years, I have extrapolated the tune of the coming two years, and I’m not willing to be the fool that dances to it.

God willing, the complete and undistorted truth about the ‘ Toronto18′ will one day surface.

Zakaria Amara
Accused in Toronto18 case
Don jail

Confessions Under Torture, in Canada? Free the Toronto 18

Posted on 30 October 2006


If you were tortured and stuck in solitary confinement for two years, rarely seeing daylight, without any of the normal legal due process and rights of habeas corpus, you might do anything you could to get out of the situation.

You might cop any plea deal the state offers you despite being completely innocent.

Only terrorist states like Israel, the USA, and now Canada have to torture confessions out of people. Psychological torture is used because it leaves no visible marks, yet destroys a person’s mind until they can be
made to believe anything.

http://www.boingboing.net/2009/04/29/solitary-confinement.html
http://www.radioproject.org/archive/2009/2209.html

Propaganda for Isr-el’s War on Terror
Even the police themselves say that the whole thing was under RCMP control the whole time, and that Canada was never in any danger.

The whole thing was stage-managed for propaganda purposes, and the arrests were timed just before Canada’s draconian security legislation was under review – which no one, not even “Taliban Jack” Layton protested.

Legislation that locked up and tortured innocent men in Canada.

Legislation that is meant to be used against political dissidents.

What is wrong with the brains of Canadians, that they are so easily fooled?

The media surely plays a leading role in the depravity of the average Canadian, who begs the thug government to protect them… sort of like a chicken asking for protection at a fox’s lair.

A media that rarely asks questions, that is owned by those that are terrified that the people will wake up to what they are doing to us.

Watch this government “terror” video, as 120 bags of ammonium nitrate magically become a ton.

Perhaps most Canadians’ perception of Zakaria Amara and the rest of the Toronto 18 alleged Muslim extremist terrorist cell is that a terrifying plot was averted, that he deserved it and that their confessions seal their guilt.

In regards to Zakaria… I’m not sure how many people had the actual intent to carry out a bombing, but the point is that the government were hardly neutral observers in this case. They directly facilitated these actions, creating a problem and then reacting to it. The Criminal Code requires the guilty mind, and the guilty act in order to be found guilty of something. Anti-terror legislation removes the guilty act, or Actus Reus, and can criminalize the simple thought of wrong-doing. It seems they are willing to provoke crime in order to test this new law out.

- from Unfair Dealings Youtube Channel

What a joke of a case

Amara was the “second ringleader”, after Qayyum Abdul Jamal.

First Ringleader:

I thought the oldest member of the Toronto 18, 43 year old Qayyum Jamal was the ‘ringleader’ for the group, according to police reports. This ringleader was so nasty he had all of his charges stayed and was released from custody in 2008, a free man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qayyum_Abdul_Jamal

Now we’re supposed to believe police when they tell us that the REAL ringleader, who was 20 years old at the time of his arrest, is Zakaria Amara; a teenager was the brains behind a plan to behead the Prime Minister with their only weapon; a single 9 mm handgun.

Second Ringleader:

Idiotic, yet genius at the same time.

The RCMP members of the group goaded and facilitated the group’s “terrorist activities” but Zionists want us to think that we are under Muslim attack.

Coddling Terrorists
The Zionist press of course tells us that we need to be doing more against the Muslims, when the real enemy is the globalist/isr-eli connected gangsters.

http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=5267

This has the added bonus of creating the perception in the minds of media-deluded Canadians that “Muslim terrorists” are coddled in Canada, as opposed to the real menace that we know comes from the same group that pushed the unconstitutional ‘anti-terror’ legislation on us.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/10/13/second-person.html

A young agricultural engineer became a mole for Canadian authorities during a sophisticated sting operation earlier this year because he wanted to help prevent a civilian calamity, the CBC program The Fifth Estate has learned.

The engineer, from a wealthy and prominent Toronto family of Egyptian background, is now in a witness protection program. He can’t be named out of concern for the safety of his immediate family.

I won’t even go into Mubain Shaikh, the crack-cocaine addicted RCMP informer who helped guide the group.

The Evidence
The RCMP video and the statement of facts might fool a lot of people, but we don’t trust convictions obtained under torture in North Korea, why should we believe the government in this case?

If the government was being truthful, they wouldn’t have hidden everything about this case from the public.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/toronto/archive/2009/10/08/documents-statement-of-facts-from-the-zakaria-amara-trial.aspx

PMK 160? Man cops are dumb, they can’t even get the name right, of the MK160 remote control board.

The way it works, is when the display lights up for an incoming call, the unit detects the light and activates.

http://www.quasarelectronics.com/velleman/mk160-remote-control-via-gsm-mobile-phone-kit.htm

Conclusion
This is not proof, because the principles of justice were thrown out the window for this case

Canada’s Zionist occupied, terrorist state and it’s corrupt and hated thug agencies like the RCMP and CSIS cannot be trusted.

Canadians are being victimized just as the Muslims are, by a criminal scam orchestrated by foreign powers.

Confessions obtained under torture are not legitimate, and the remaining suspects should be freed immediately, and those that orchestrated the timing of the arrests with the anti-liberty legislation the government rammed through should be arrested.

Zakaria Amara’s Speech
http://www.captiveincanada.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=464

Source: Zakaria Amara – 13-jun-08

In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Compassionate

Bismillahir Rahman Nir raheem

Two years have passed since my arrest. When I was taken to Maplehurst I was held in the custody of the Institutional Crisis Intervention Team. Whenever I was moved from place to place, they would force me to run with my hands and legs shacked while my back was bent at 90 degrees forward.

When I was first brought to cell 1 unit 1K, I was slammed face first on the floor, a huge shield was then pressed against my back while a guard smeared my face with his boots because I dared lift my head

Whenever I was moved out of my cell, I was required to slide my hands through the hatch of the door, before it was opened in order to be hand cuffed. To do this I had to kneel on both knees. Many times when I put my hands through the hatch, the guards would forcefully pull my wrists so that my forehead would slam against the metal door.

Whenever the guards came in to collect the garbage they would often apply wrestling manoeuvres on me for the purpose of entertaining themselves. They would sometimes apply pressure on sensitive areas such as my temple and fingers. One day when I came back from court, a guard twisted my hands above my head forcing me to skip on one foot back to my cell.

Since then I have languished in solitary confinement, where for the first year on a daily basis, I spent 23 hours and 40 minutes in a cell no bigger than an apartment’s washroom.

The 23 hours and 40 minutes became a complete 24 hours when I was transferred to the Don Jail. Since then, I have seen the sun less than 10 times and have gone to the exercise yard less than 30 times.

My health, psychologically and physically is deteriorating. I was planning to testify at my trial but now I am not even sure if I will be mentally capable of doing so by the time it comes around, if it ever does.

As for the state of this so called Judicial Process, then I must admit I was naïve. I came in two years ago with the expectation of transparency only to be confronted with section 38, complete denial of CSIS disclosure, censorship of vital information in the so-called RCMP disclosure, and the concealing of state agents identities which by law must be revealed as opposed to informants whose identities are protected.

To expect the accused to mount an adequate defence in the face of such barriers, in a case which is political and state entrapment is a live issue, is to expect a frail old man to defend himself with his hands tied behind and eyes blindfolded, against a professional boxer.

I am not being subjective. I realize that all government agencies have secrets that must be protected. However, authorities have in the past used ‘ National Security’ to cover up their dirty work, exculpatory evidence and embarrassing facts. The Maher Arar case is a classic example.

Last year, I was denied the freedom to mix with the other human beings due to the dreamed up danger that I could somehow pose or communicate from within a six-cell block, monitored physically by correctional officers as well as virtually by closed circuit cameras, within a maximum security prison.

During about the same time, I conceded committal to trial for the exchange of having the opportunity to cross-examine a list of witnesses agreed upon by the crown. Both parties signed this agreement yet somehow, we are to believe, there was some alleged ambiguity that allowed the crown to file a direct indictment and effectively breach its undertaking. Now I am in a difficult position of having to cross-examine the main witness in my case, for the first time, at trial.

The unfair manoeuvre has also effectively robbed me of the ability to discover my case, which is a fundamental necessity for developing my defence. This is not an alleged bank robbery or a drug bust. The stakes for the government and the authorities are high thus making the potential for corruption and malice equally high if not higher.

During the adult preliminary, Mr. Bond used to monitor our eye blinks in the prisoner box to ensure that we were not violating the communication ban. While he was busy doing that, his star witness Mubin Shiekh was slaughtering the publication ban on National and international airwaves.

The crown held and is still holding the accused on various charges based on the desire to exaggerate this case and in order to hamper their bail chances and not on the merits of evidence.

These are only some of the main issues that I have. They may very well be supported by law, but at the end of the day, they remain unfair to any mind endowed with the faculty of reason and understanding. As St. Augustine said “An unjust law is no law at all”.

I never asked anyone to believe that I was innocent. All I ever asked for was a chance to prove it. After two years, I have come to realize that even this simple request is too much to expect from this process.

In conclusion, to continue to respect such a process is an insult to my dignity, the very little intellect that I have and my faith.

I will God willing, continue to defend myself through my lawyers, and I will continue to obey orders made by the court with the exception of the order to show it respect since I can’t be expected to give what I no longer have. This, in effect, means that I will no longer stand up for any judge as he/she enters and leaves the courtroom.

Based of the rhythm of the past two years, I have extrapolated the tune of the coming two years, and I’m not willing to be the fool that dances to it.

God willing, the complete and undistorted truth about the ‘ Toronto18′ will one day surface.

Zakaria Amara
Accused in Toronto18 case
Don jail

http://www.captiveincanada.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=477

The Foot Grenade

Posted on 24 December 2001


grenade1

 

      Passengers have learned to accept the unorthodox on airliners       

      nowadays, from sky marshals idly twiddling with their Glock semi automatic

      pistols, to bottles of free champagne designed to restore your good humor if

      the sky marshal accidentally squeezes the trigger and shoots you instead of a

hijacker. But hey, yo

Mahmud the Red Framed for WTC 93 Bombings

Posted on 24 June 2001


The Secret Life of Mahmud the Red
By RICHARD BEHAR Sunday, Jun. 24, 2001

It was 4 o’clock on a cold, neon-lit morning in New Jersey last Feb. 26 when a yellow Ryder rental van pulled into a Jersey City service station. A blue Honda sedan was right behind it. The attendants were more alert than usual at that hour because the station had recently been robbed. But these customers wanted only gas. The Honda’s driver, a tall, red-haired, freckled man, paid for both vehicles with a $50 bill. A curious attendant tried to peer into the van. The driver, a younger, wiry man with a full beard, suddenly hopped out and planted himself in front of a side window, blocking the view.

Eight hours later, the van made history. It disintegrated into thousands of pieces as the 1,200-lb. bomb it was carrying thundered through the parking garage of the World Trade Center in Manhattan, tearing a 200-ft.-wide crater in the basement of the world’s second tallest building. Six people were killed, and more than 1,000 were injured. The worst terrorist attack on American soil sent federal agents scrambling on a global manhunt. One of the suspects, a 33-year-old redhead, was captured in his native Egypt by government agents, brutally tortured until he confessed to the bombing and then flown back to America to stand trial. His name: Mahmud Abouhalima. Prosecutors say Abouhalima, a former New York City taxi driver, was the ) motorist who paid for the fuel on that February morning in Jersey City. But his significance doesn’t end there. The U.S. contends that he is the epitome of the modern terrorist, a self-made commando pursuing a homemade agenda to disrupt Western civilization.

Today Abouhalima and three colleagues sit quietly in Courtroom 318 in downtown Manhattan, six blocks from the Twin Towers, watching intently as their lawyers and the prosecutors joust over the selection of jurors. So prominent is the case that U.S. District Judge Kevin Duffy rounded up 5,000 citizens in his effort to assemble an unbiased jury — 10 times the number called for last year’s sensational trial of Mob chieftain John Gotti. Opening arguments in the bombing case are expected to begin next week. The trial will probably take three to four months, all the while under heavy security provided by dozens of extra police officers.

The proceedings are the first of at least two trials in which 22 Islamic fundamentalists — including Mahmud’s younger brother Mohammed — will be tried for taking part in a massive plot to undermine the U.S. government. The catalog of charges, according to New York University law scholar Stephen Gillers, amounts to “the gravest allegations to come out of any American court in this century.” Among the accusations: bombing the Trade Center, murdering the militant Zionist Rabbi Meir Kahane, plotting to kill Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak and U.S. Senator Alfonse D’Amato, and scheming to blow up two major highway tunnels and other New York City landmarks.

Federal agents contend that the ginger-haired Abouhalima, known to friends as Mahmud the Red, was a mastermind of the tower explosion. They portray him as a commando leader who relied on his guerrilla training in Afghanistan to instruct his colleagues in bomb testing and other military techniques. Compared with his bumbling co-defendants, who left their fingerprints on rental-car receipts and explosives splattered on their walls, Abouhalima is an elusive target for prosecutors. His alleged ability to play a central role in such a wide-ranging conspiracy yet leave so little physical evidence has made him seem like a kind of Teflon Terrorist.

There is still much that is mystifying about Abouhalima. The allegation would seem comical if a bomb had not actually ripped through the World Trade Center: an immigrant cabdriver tries to blow up a world-famous symbol of the American Dream. So much of Abouhalima’s past seems humdrum that to read his $ story and believe in his guilt is to be reminded of Hannah Arendt’s line about Adolf Eichmann embodying the banality of evil. Look at pieces of his life, however, and one finds a growing religious fervor that could have transformed Abouhalima into a man with a motive for destruction in the name of a higher goal. Says Wayne Gilbert, who retired in July as the FBI’s assistant director of intelligence: “In terms of his background, Abouhalima may be the prototype for the kind of terrorist we’re going to see in the future.” This is his story.

EGYPT, LAND WITHOUT HOPE

The graffiti on the side of a house in Kafr al-Dawar, where Abouhalima spent his childhood, capture some of the conflicting cultural forces that have buffeted this Nile Delta town in the past few years. The mural shows a grinning Mickey Mouse pointing his white-gloved hand to a familiar Koranic text: GOD IS GRACIOUS AND MERCIFUL.

Kafr is at a crossroads, trapped between an old world and a newer one. This ramshackle suburb, 15 miles south of Alexandria, is dominated by a state-owned textile factory, an industrial fortress decorated with bunting in the Egyptian national colors of red, white and black. Meanwhile, the families of workers are housed in a sprawling walled enclave of cramped, featureless concrete bungalows. The streets, mostly unpaved, are overflowing with 250,000 people. Unemployment is high, and most of the young people flee overseas to find work elsewhere. Kafr al-Dawar’s civic history is marked by a bloody strike in 1952. Today Islamic militancy is on the rise, while the police and the national government are despised. The slogan on political posters is explicit: ISLAM IS THE SOLUTION.

Abouhalima was born here in 1959, the first of four sons of a mill foreman. Villagers remember him as an ordinary, well-rounded and cheerful youth who found comfort in religion. He prayed hard and shunned alcohol. “Mahmud has a loving personality,” says Uncle Ali. Another uncle, Ibrahim, insists that his nephew never attended any Islamic meetings as a youth and was no activist as a student. Says he: “Mahmud studied education at Alexandria University, came home, played soccer, and that’s it.”

But that was not all of it. According to friends, Abouhalima developed a deep and growing hatred for Egypt because he felt his country offered little hope for his generation’s future. Despite its poverty, Abouhalima’s family was several cuts above the norm, which may have created an expectation in the $ young man that a better life was obtainable. His rebellion began in small ways. He started to smoke, but never once lit a cigarette in front of his stern father, a powerful weight lifter who would have disapproved. As a teenager, Abouhalima began to hang around with members of the outlawed al- Jama’a Islamiyya, or Islamic Group, which considered the blind Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman its spiritual guide.

The group, which is committed to making Egypt an Islamic state, was banned on college campuses in 1979. Several times, Abouhalima’s friends were rounded up by authorities. Mahmoud Abdel Shafi, an Egyptian lawyer who represents Islamic militants, remembers that Abouhalima occasionally came to him in 1980, at age 20, to get help for friends who had been arrested. “There was a crackdown on Muslim youths who were trying to remain steadfast in their faith,” says Shafi. “Mahmud was not planting bombs. He was concerned about what was happening. He simply took it upon himself to try to help those who were in prison.”

A year later, Abouhalima quit school and left Egypt. “I think that to him, immigration meant an escape from persecution,” says Shafi. “The internal- security forces were watching him. Usually that means you will be detained and imprisoned and the door will start to close. He thought it was time to get out.”

SMOKY GATHERINGS IN GERMANY

In September 1981, Abouhalima was granted a visa to visit Germany as a tourist. It was a good time to leave Egypt. Earlier that month Anwar Sadat had arrested some 2,000 Islamic intellectuals, clerics and fundamentalists who opposed him. One week after Abouhalima departed, militants killed the Egyptian President. Meanwhile, in Munich, Abouhalima sought political asylum, claiming that he faced persecution in Egypt because of his membership in the Muslim Brotherhood, a fundamentalist party that was then facing a harsh crackdown.

Abouhalima moved into the Islamic Center, located in a suburb on Munich’s north side, which is home to a large immigrant Muslim community. The center boasts a futuristic blue mosque, dormitory-style accommodations where arrivals like Abouhalima can stay, as well as instruction in the Koran. But Abouhalima’s newfound comfort was shattered in October 1982, when his request for asylum was denied. The reason: if Abouhalima had never participated in crimes, as he maintained, he should have nothing to fear from the Egyptian authorities. Germany gave him two weeks to leave the country.

, Luckily for him, by that time Abouhalima had moved in with Egyptian friends who lived in an apartment building in Munich. Across the hall resided a 34- year-old German named Renate Soika, a nurse with a history of alcoholism and emotional problems. As far as Abouhalima was concerned, it was a perfect match. The wedding took place at city hall in December, enabling him to remain in Germany.

Soika was happy to help Abouhalima stay in Munich. In return, she got a provider who was tall, courteous and confident. It wasn’t love exactly, but Mahmud’s traditional values appealed to Soika. He prayed five times a day and avoided alcohol. He brought her flowers on her birthday. And he insisted that she quit her job and devote her time to cooking and caring for the home. “He was always polite and friendly,” recalls Soika. “He was never violent, never aggressive.”

Eager to finish his education in order to become a teacher, Abouhalima took night classes in German and soon spoke the language fluently. He also worked at menial jobs, first as a dishwasher, then behind the meat counter of a grocery store. A former co-worker remembers Abouhalima as a quiet, hardworking man who was constantly tired, but never tardy.

Abouhalima’s social life revolved around the Egyptian immigrant community in Munich, especially the orthodox Muslims he met while praying in makeshift mosques. He invited several Muslim friends who needed housing to live temporarily with him and his wife. Abouhalima conducted many smoky gatherings in their home, where groups of Egyptians would sit and discuss politics in Arabic, which Soika did not understand. Soika says she was left with the impression that Mahmud worked in some kind of “underground,” but she couldn’t put her finger on it. “He never said anything about it directly,” she says. “But I could well imagine it.”

Abouhalima never hid his opinions. He condemned the governments of Sadat and later Mubarak, along with their supporters like the U.S. Abouhalima had little regard for Germans, complaining that they drank too much, had cold personalities and spent money too lavishly. Despite his bitterness toward Egypt, he longed for his homeland and spoke about it often. He read Arabic newspapers, and since his parents did not own a telephone, he made it a point to call one of his uncles in Egypt every Sunday.

Soika’s relationship with her husband began to dissolve when she refused to convert to Islam and provide him with offspring. When Soika became pregnant in 1984, she had an abortion against her husband’s will. Soon thereafter, Soika arrived home early after spending nine weeks at a health clinic for treatment of stress. When she opened the door, she found a 21-year-old woman named Marianne Weber staying in the apartment. Abouhalima suggested that the three live together as one happy family, but Soika refused. They divorced in February 1985, after Abouhalima had married Weber in a Muslim ceremony at the Islamic Center.

Despite Soika’s resentment, she still refers to Abouhalima as her husband and keeps his surname on the doorbell of her current home. She is angry, yet still incredulous about his alleged involvement in the bombing. “The electric chair would be too good for him,” she says, on the verge of tears. “I don’t know how he can sleep at night after what he did. He prays five times a day and then does this? He’s made a mockery of his religion. I can’t grasp it. It doesn’t fit with my image of him.”

A GLORIFIED CELL IN BROOKLYN

When Marianne Weber met Abouhalima, she was studying in Munich, dreaming of becoming a dancer and trying hard to recover from the death of her 17-year-old brother in a motorcycle crash. “I was mostly depressed and looking for a purpose to my life,” she says today. After meeting Abouhalima, she started skipping classes. She took him to meet her parents, Ernst and Hildegard, in her hometown of Vogt, a picturesque village in the hills of Swabia in southern Germany. The Webers, who own a wine shop next to their house, considered Abouhalima a harmless boyfriend. In a family photo album, beside a label that reads last picture, a smiling Marianne and Mahmud pose in the German countryside. He wears a moustache, jeans and a pair of thongs. She wears a sleeveless blouse and summer skirt, her hair long and blond.

It was the last time she allowed herself to be photographed. After marrying Abouhalima, she converted to Islam and moved with him to a government- subsidized high-rise. Her parents didn’t find out about the wedding until four months later. In the fall of 1985, the couple announced that they were flying to the U.S. for a three-week visit. They settled in Brooklyn and never returned, leaving behind most of their possessions. “After they lied about the trip to America, I had real doubts about my son-in-law,” says Hildegard. When Abouhalima’s German residency permit expired in 1986, police came looking for him in Munich and found a vacant apartment. It remains unclear why the authorities took such an interest in Mahmud the Red.

THE STREETS OF NEW YORK

Six months after Abouhalima arrived in New York, his tourist visa expired. Fortunately for him, Congress was preparing to authorize an amnesty program for more than 1 million illegal aliens who merely had to assert that they worked as migrant farmers. Abouhalima applied for amnesty in 1986, received temporary legal residence in 1988 and became a permanent resident two years after that. Through an attorney, Abouhalima now claims he worked for seven months on a farm in South Carolina. But his current wife told a TIME reporter that she can remember no travels outside the New York metropolitan area except for one trip to Michigan to visit friends. “The amnesty program was a joke,” says Duke Austin, a spokesman at the Immigration and Naturalization Service. “Since documentation wasn’t required, the burden was on the government to prove the aliens were not farmers. Fraud was widespread and enforcement virtually impossible.”

After getting his right-to-work papers in 1986, Abouhalima got a chauffeur’s license and proceeded to drive taxicabs in New York for the next five years. His license was suspended 10 times for failing to respond to summonses for traffic violations. He regularly passed through red lights, drove without a license and neglected to have his car registered and inspected. Once, he was even found guilty of driving with broken meter seals, a telltale sign of an attempt to rip off customers.

One passenger who rode twice in Abouhalima’s taxi was John Hockenberry, a correspondent for ABC. He remembers a kind, bubbly driver who went out of his way to help the disabled journalist with his wheelchair. But his taxi was filled with Korans and Arabic books that Abouhalima would read at traffic lights, ignoring what was happening on the streets. Cassette tapes blared Arabic sermons. When Abouhalima spoke with Hockenberry, the cabdriver mentioned that America would lose the war against Islam without even knowing when that moment had arrived.

“He had this contempt for materialistic America, even though he was here,” recalls Hockenberry. “He would honk at people and say, ‘Look at that rich person,’ and ‘Look at that person.’ He seemed very much out of his element. He had transformed his cab into an impromptu, monosyllabic Islamic institute.”

In 1988 Weber’s mother visited the couple, toting sweaters for her grandchildren and a photo album of Marianne’s childhood. But Marianne wouldn’t allow her to bring the book into the sparse apartment in Brooklyn, where the walls were bare except for Islamic scripture. One cousin refers to the environment as “a glorified cell.” The family ate on the floor, and Hildegard barely saw her son-in-law. “We are ‘real’ Muslims,” her daughter tried to explain. The Abouhalimas were so poor that the Webers wired them $5,000 in a series of bank transfers.

In early 1990 Abouhalima leased a taxi medallion, which drivers often need to work in the city’s regulated livery industry. Seven months later, he vanished. The broker says he wrote several letters to Abouhalima, demanding the return of the medallion, the car’s license plates and $1,600. Abouhalima’s wife can recall no such dispute.

WARRIOR IN AFGHANISTAN

As he drove his cab, Abouhalima daydreamed about the “jihad,” or holy war, in Afghanistan. He was obsessed with the mission of the 200,000 Muslim rebels in that country, the mujahedin, who had been battling for 10 years to oust the Soviet-backed government. The burly cabdriver worked long hours for a nonprofit group in Brooklyn that raised money for the rebels and recruited hundreds of young enthusiasts to join the fight. The fund’s director was a fellow Egyptian named Mustafa Shalabi, and both the men and their wives became very close.

After obtaining his green card in late 1988, Abouhalima took several trips to Pakistan during the next 20 months, where he was trained for combat. His Egyptian spiritual leader, Sheik Omar, who was acquitted of encouraging Sadat’s murder, had arrived in Pakistan seven months earlier with two sons who would also join the war. It was a heady time for militant Islamists. During the 1980s, an estimated 20,000 Arabs from 50 nations rallied to the Afghan jihad. Many, like Abouhalima and Sheik Omar, were men without a country, fugitives from antifundamentalist regimes. Some traveled under false names on false passports. Others, called holiday guerrillas, went to fight for a few months on tourist visas.

For many, the Afghan war was a transforming experience. “I haven’t met one person who was sorry he went,” says Ahmed Sattar, a director of a Brooklyn mosque where Abouhalima and other defendants prayed. “Most of them left America as ordinary men and came back so devout and so proud. The war reminded them of the glorious old days, many hundreds of years ago, when Muslims were fighting the infidel.”

Abouhalima’s training site was the frontier city of Peshawar in Pakistan, near the Afghan border, where the major mujahedin parties had their headquarters and where more than 50 Arab relief agencies and unofficial groups had offices. The mujahedin received an estimated $3.5 billion in financial support from the CIA as well, which bankrolled training for the Muslim warriors in the use of explosives and modern weapons. Abouhalima settled in one of the many transit houses known as the House of Friends, where young Arabs were often crammed four to a room.

The cliquish Arabs were sometimes viewed with suspicion by their Afghan brothers, who sensed that the volunteers had a wider agenda. Even so, their zeal in combat amazed even the fearless Afghans. “The Arabs were crazy fighters, charging into any fire,” recalls Ahmed Muwafak Zaidan, a Syrian writer who covered the war. An Egyptian scholar in Pakistan remembers Abouhalima and conspiracy defendant Siddig Ibrahim Siddig Ali as “very good commanders who fought in various provinces” of Afghanistan.

BROOKLYN MURDER MYSTERY

By the time he returned from Afghanistan in July 1990, Abouhalima was in his radical prime. (Sheik Omar arrived the same month, probably by coincidence.) Neighbors recall Abouhalima wearing fatigues and army boots. He reportedly joined several future defendants at a rifle range in a Connecticut forest, where they wore traditional Muslim clothing, knelt repeatedly in prayer — and practiced shooting AK-47 rifles from the hip. While Abouhalima regularly moved his family to different dwellings in New York and New Jersey, his spiritual life revolved around two mosques in working-class immigrant neighborhoods: Abu Bakr in Brooklyn and al-Salam in Jersey City, where Sheik Omar often delivered his acid-tongued diatribes against secularism.

One Egyptian who attended the al-Salam mosque while the sheik was preaching recalls that many listeners were Egyptian expatriates, like Abouhalima, who had undergone college training for a profession but were forced to take menial jobs in America. Some felt demeaned. Most were alienated, lonely, and suffered from guilt at having abandoned Egypt. “It was easy for a speaker like Sheik Omar to exploit those feelings,” says the observer, “and that is exactly what he was doing.”

Almost from the moment the two men arrived in the U.S. in 1990, Abouhalima began serving as the holy man’s part-time bodyguard and driver, a fact that Abouhalima has confirmed to the New York Times despite the sheik’s claim that he doesn’t know the man. The sheik’s sponsor in America was Shalabi, Abouhalima’s boss at the Afghan recruitment center in Brooklyn. Before long, Shalabi and Sheik Omar became entangled in a struggle for leadership of the Muslim circle. In March 1991 Shalabi was found shot and stabbed to death on the floor of his apartment.

The dead man’s family believes he was murdered on Sheik Omar’s orders. Some say Rahman accused him of working for the CIA and stealing money intended for the rebels. “I think the sheik was simply jealous because Shalabi was becoming too powerful,” says a police investigator. Despite his long friendship with Shalabi, Abouhalima emerged as a prime murder suspect, but he was never charged, and the case remains unsolved. Seven days after Shalabi’s murder, the FBI received a tip that Abouhalima was harboring explosives. Dressed as utility workers, federal agents searched his Brooklyn apartment but came up empty-handed.

In December 1991 one of Abouhalima’s friends from the Afghan center, El Sayyid Nosair, was put on trial for the shooting death of Rabbi Kahane the previous year. In this case too, Abouhalima was briefly a suspect. Police believed he was the intended getaway driver but that Nosair jumped into the wrong taxi by mistake. In 1991 Nosair was acquitted of murder but convicted on assault and weapons-related charges. In August the sweeping conspiracy indictment linked Nosair to the trade-center plot as well.

Abouhalima and his friends are enthralled by Nosair, whom they view as a hero. They devoutly attended his trial and rallied outside on the sidewalk. After the murder acquittal, a jubilant Abouhalima hoisted defense lawyer William Kunstler onto his shoulders and carried him from the courthouse. Thereafter, Abouhalima visited Nosair frequently in prison.

Last year Abouhalima’s mother-in-law spent two weeks with the couple, who had by then moved to Newark. Mahmud made every effort to improve the relationship. “He tried to please,” Hildegard Weber recalls. “But they wouldn’t show me their friends. They knew I was distrustful.”

THE SUDDEN DEPARTURE

On March 5, 1993, just one week after the bomb ripped through the World Trade Center, Weber got a surprise phone call from her daughter. Marianne was hoping her parents could meet her and her four children in Amsterdam before returning to Vogt for a brief visit. Afterward, she said, she would travel to ; Egypt to meet up with Abouhalima. “I was suspicious,” says Hildegard. “I asked her directly if this had something to do with the bombing.”

Marianne seemed stunned at her mother’s question. Mahmud was not even a known suspect at the time. She answered her mother with a sarcastic expression, chiding her for blaming Muslims. But Abouhalima’s mother-in-law had reason to be wary. Since eloping in 1985, Marianne had ruled out a visit to Germany because her immigration status would prevent her from returning to America.

Later that same evening, Marianne phoned her parents again, this time to scrap the plans. She and Mahmud had decided to stay in New York, she explained. In reality, her husband was already in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, having flown there three days earlier from New York’s Kennedy airport. He then made his way to his hometown in Egypt, where he was hauled into custody by government agents, who, according to Mahmud’s wife, stripped him naked, hung him by his feet and burned his genitals. “The Egyptians told him that if he didn’t confess ((to the bombing)), they would rape me and his mother,” says Marianne, who by then had arrived in Egypt with her children. Mahmud’s 15- year-old brother Sayed was also abducted. According to the family, Sayed was severely beaten until Mahmud finally confessed. “Every time we ask Sayed what happened, he bursts into tears and refuses to speak,” says their uncle Ali.

The arrest left neighbors in Kafr al-Dawar confused and angry. “This is a filthy, corrupt government,” declares a local man. “It accuses everyone and is unjust.” Abouhalima’s family members claim they were warned that if they talk to foreign journalists they will be arrested and will face “serious” consequences.

THE CASE AGAINST THE CABDRIVER

A gag order has barred prosecutors from giving sneak previews of their strategy, but they have indicated that they will portray Abouhalima as a major player in the conspiracy. After the tower attack, they claim, he flew to the Middle East to escape. Abouhalima, for his part, says that during the bombing he was at home with his family in Woodbridge, New Jersey, observing the rituals of the Muslim holy season of Ramadan. His flight to the Middle East, he claims, was a pilgrimage to Mecca followed by a reunion with parents and siblings in Egypt.

Abouhalima admits to knowing two of his fellow defendants in the bombing case, Nidal Ayyad and Mohammad Salameh, both age 25. The government claims to , have evidence showing Abouhalima meeting on many occasions with other alleged plotters to prepare for the bombing. In one case, Abouhalima joined Salameh to remove explosives from a New Jersey apartment, the indictment claims. In another instance, prosecutors say they can prove Abouhalima participated in a “test explosion.” The alleged test may have taken place in a remote part of Pennsylvania, where Abouhalima conducted weapons training with Siddig Ali, his fellow “commander” from the Afghan war, who will stand trial next year. Furthermore, the witnesses at the Jersey City filling station claim they saw Abouhalima and Salameh gassing up the yellow van just hours before the bombing. Their accounts are considered so crucial that they have been placed under federal protection.

Prosecutors will also rely on surreptitious tapes made by a Muslim informant, Emad Salem. However, the handful of typewritten drafts of tapes that have been obtained by journalists are sometimes vague about which Abouhalima brother they are referring to. When the tapes are introduced as evidence, defense lawyers will argue that Arabic is a language of fiery hyperbole and wild exaggeration.

Hassen Ibn Abdellah, Abouhalima’s lead attorney, contends that the case against him is weak because FBI probes of his client both before and after the bombing failed to produce the kind of physical evidence agents have gathered against the other alleged bombers. For example, Nidal Ayyad’s saliva matches the traces left on an envelope containing a letter claiming responsibility for the bombing. Fragments of hydrogen tanks found in the wreckage were traced to a manufacturer and ultimately to Salameh, sources told TIME.

Abouhalima’s defenders may decide to put him on the witness stand to charm the jury. His former lawyer, Jesse Berman, says he comes across as very bright and “very human,” has an excellent sense of humor and even knows some Yiddish. Abdellah, a former prosecutor, intends to argue before the jury that religious persecution is a motivating force behind the case. “This trial is about Islam; it’s not about the World Trade Center,” he declares.

The defense will also portray Abouhalima as a devout Muslim and family man. Since his arrest, Abouhalima has twice phoned his mother-in-law in Germany, asking her to help care for his family. “I know that my husband is innocent and that gives me strength,” Marianne declares. “Allah is testing us. He will give us justice now or in the next life. I’m patient.”

4 Innocent Muslims Framed by Israelis and American Jews for the 1998 Embassy Bombings

Posted on 29 May 2001


CNN BREAKING NEWS
Verdict Reached in U.S. Embassy Bombing Trials
Aired May 29, 2001 – 12:23   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
DARYN KAGAN, CNN ANCHOR: Breaking news once again here at CNN. We’re getting word that there is a verdict in the embassy bombings trial, the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

With more this, let’s go to our Bob Franken in New York — Bob.

BOB FRANKEN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: This is the twelfth day of deliberations for the jurors, and they have just told the judge that they have a verdict; a verdict on 576 different counts, a the 302- count indictment charging four who are defendants in this case with participating in conspiracies and carrying out the bombings on August 7, 1998 which result in Kenya — in Nairobi, Kenya — in the death of 213, including 12 Americans, with thousands wounded and almost simultaneously in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which resulted in 11 more deaths. Altogether 224 death, four defendants.

The indictment itself actually names 22, including Osama bin Laden, who is described as the person who’s been the ringleader of this conspiracy to carry out of those bombings. This is a trail that has lasted 4 1/2 months, after an event that took place on August 7, 1998. It’s a trial that has been covered almost in its entirety by CNN’s Deborah Feyerick.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

DEBORAH FEYERICK, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): In a federal courtroom in lower Manhattan, a continent away from the U.S. Embassy bombings, four men have been standing trial, charged with plotting to attack Americans and American facilities.

Prosecutors say Mohammed Al-’Owhali, Khalfan Mohamed, Mohamed Odeh, and Wadih El-Hage were part of an international terrorist conspiracy led by millionaire Saudi exile Osama bin Laden. That conspiracy, prosecutors say, led to the bombing of U.S. Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Two hundred and twenty- four people, including a dozen Americans, were killed in the coordinated explosions nearly three years ago.

During the trial, which began in January, prosecutors called over 90 witnesses and presented hundreds of pieces of evidence, including clothing laced with bomb residue. The jury also saw pieces of the mangled trucks used to carry the bombs, and box loads of documents, with plane tickets and passports, which prosecutors say link the four men to the conspiracy. Perhaps most powerful in the prosecution’s arsenal: incriminating statements made to FBI agents by the three men charged in the bombing: Khalfan Mohamed saying he helped grind TNT used in Tanzania; Mohammed Al-’Owhali saying he threw stun grenades at the embassy guards in Kenya, and Mohamed Odeh saying the truck would have caused more damage to the Kenya Embassy if it had been turned backwards.

After defense attorneys failed to get the statements tossed out by the judge, they tried to persuade the jury to ignore them, calling them coerced, unreliable, biased.

FREDERICK COHN, AL-’OWHALI’S DEFENSE ATTORNEY: If they discard the statement, there is no evidence of anything.

FEYERICK: Only Wadih El-Hage is not charged in the bombings, but in the larger conspiracy. Prosecutors say he ran companies that helped bin Laden finance his alleged terrorist enterprise. His lawyer has repeatedly argued El-Hage was an honest businessman with a poor choice in acquaintances.

SAM SCHMIDT, EL-HAGE’S DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Association does not mean joining a conspiracy. If it did, many people in the United States would have a great deal of problems.

FEYERICK: In reaching its decision, the jury had to make its way through more than 300 counts for the alleged anti-American conspiracy, for the bombings, and for each victim killed in the blasts.

Deborah Feyerick, CNN, New York.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

FRANKEN: And in fact, as Deborah Feyerick said, there were 302 counts in the document. Actually, there were a total of 576 charges. The jury had to go through each and every one of them because combinations of defendants were charged with various of the offenses that were alleged in the indictment.

Now, let’s go in some detail defendants. The first one is Mohamed Al-’Owhali. He is somebody who is charged with actually participating in the bombing in Nairobi, Kenya on August 7, 1998. He is charged with having actually thrown a stun grenade at one of the security people at the embassy, which preceded the actual bombing which left 213 dead, 12 of them Americans, and also thousands injured.

Now, the FBI was able to accumulate some evidence, as the investigation fanned out worldwide; the FBI and other international law organizations. Some of the evidence included his fingerprints, which were found in the truck, and the police line-up photo. He was identified by one of the people who was at the embassy that day. There were the bullets that were found in hospital.

He was injured in the actual explosion, and they were found by hospital personnel thereafter, and keys to the bomb truck itself. And of course, the Kenya Embassy in Nairobi was vulnerable, so vulnerable because it was right downtown, and so that became something that the photographs of that embassy became part of the evident.

Now, Mohamed Odeh is charged with conspiracy on the bombing. He is not charged with actually taking part. He is charged with actually helping to construct the bomb in the Hilltop Motel in Nairobi, Kenya. He is charged with conspiracy to kill Americans, conspiracy to destroy U.S. buildings and property, the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kenya, and the murders of 213 people in Nairobi, Kenya.

He, since he was not a direct participant in the actual act, is not facing the death penalty. The first person we discussed, Mohammed Al-’Owhali, and we’ll get to verdicts later on on the ones that result in the death penalty.

In any case, some of the evidence that Mohamed Odeh had to face was evidence of his travel bag with clothing that was found as he was arrested in Pakistan, just about the time that the bombing occurred. It showed that there were some residue of TNT evidence, said prosecutors, that he, in fact, had help construct the bomb, and fingerprints from this Hilltop Hotel which placed there.

The defense said that yes, he was there, but he did not participate in any sort of effort to actually have the bombing. And of course, the sketch of the embassy was also included in the evidence. An FBI agent, John Anticev, said that Odeh said it was a blunder that this occurred, but he denied any sort of planning or training for this. He, of course, is denying that he participated in any sort of conspiracy.

The next defendant is Khalfan Khamis Mohamed. He is called by just about everybody K.K. Mohammed. He, too, faces the death penalty. He faces it because he has been charged with — the allegation is that he directly participated in the bombing in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. It’s charged that he actually accompanied the driver of the truck in that bombing part of the way there.

Also, he used a flour mill that was used to grind the TNT in the — and also to rent a house where the bomb was actually made, and also to purchase the Jeep that was used to deliver the bomb. Those are the charges that are against him.

By the way, I point out again, we are awaiting the verdicts. The jury, which has deliberated 12 days, has said that it has reached its verdicts. I point out again, there are 576 different charges, 302- count indictment. It will take a long period of time to actually go through the indictment charge after charge after charge. We will, of course, be looking at the beginning, at the conspiracy charges, to, in fact, find out if all four defendants who were charged in that one have been found guilty.

If, in fact, they have been, we will be able to report that they were found guilty of their participation in these bombings, the nearly simultaneous bombings on August 7, 1998.

Now, the last defendant. He is really quite a different defendant, and that Wadih El-Hage. He is an American citizen, a naturalized American citizen, Lebanese by birth. He has been charged with being the personal secretary of Osama bin Laden, who, as you probably know, is the person who leads this organization that is alleged, is dedicated to the overthrow and the death of Americans, and that is part of this indictment, too.

We’ll get to that in a moment, but anyway, El-Hage is charged with participating in the conspiracy itself. He is also charged with perjury for lying to the New York grand jury that considered this case, lying about his association with Osama bin Laden.

Now, the evidence included stuff that was taken from his house when he lived in Nairobi, Kenya. It included documents that were seized in his laptop computer, his address books, and also some evidence concerning a plane that Osama bin Laden tried to rent. All of this was material that was taken from his home in Nairobi, a.

Since then, he has moved to a suburb of Dallas, Texas — Arlington, Texas — where he lives, as I said, as a naturalized American, but now he is charged with participating in the conspiracy. His charges do not include the possibility of the death penalty.

The main defendant, however, the main person who was charged in the indictment who is not a defendant is Osama bin Laden himself. He heads this organization that, as I say, has spent the last several years, in fact, fighting the United States of America. He has been living in Afghanistan.

He is considered the leader of this conspiracy according to the prosecutors. He is one of the people named in the indictment, but he is not somebody who is actually facing trial here. Only four defendants, and right now, we are awaiting the jury that will start reading its many, many, many verdicts, and we’ll find out what their fate will be.

KAGAN: Bob Franken, thank you so much. Once again, for people who are just joining us, viewers who are just joining us, the verdicts are in the in the embassy bombing trial. We’ll be hearing those in just a bit, or hearing what those might be.

Bob, do we know exactly when the verdicts will — when they’ll start reading them?

FRANKEN: Well, it could be, I would guess, within the next half hour. That could only be a guess. The judge had not really called the jury in yet. This has been a very laborious process. Time after time, as recently as just a few minutes ago, the jury had sent out notes asking for specific evidence.

Obviously, the members of the jury took their work quite seriously. The members, by the way, include seven women and five men, a very diverse group. So, we just have to wait until the jurors come in and they start reading the litany of the charges and the disposition of each defendant on each charge.

KAGAN: Bob Franken in New York City, you stay with us. Once again, the verdicts in in the embassy bombing trial in New York City; four international defendants waiting to hear their fate. TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com

Mohammed Sadek Odeh Asks to have Confession of Guilt Annulled

Posted on 17 July 2000


Source: The East African

Regional
Monday, July 17, 2000
Odeh Withdraws Torture Complaint
By KEVIN KELLEY
SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

ONE OF the defendants in the East African embassy bombings case asked recently that his confession of guilt be annulled as trial evidence because Kenyan authorities had threatened to torture and kill him during interrogation.

The claim of psychological coercion was contained in a court affidavit filed on July 11 by attorneys representing Mohammed Sadeek Odeh. Now in custody in New York and awaiting trial next January, Odeh is accused of helping plan the 1998 the twin bombings of the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam that killed 224 people and wounded 5,000 others.

But, in a confounding development, Odeh told his attorneys, after they had submitted the affidavit, that he wants it withdrawn.

Anthony Ricco, one of three lawyers representing Odeh, said he would comply with his client’s instructions on July 14. Odeh, a Muslim with Jordanian citizenship, decided for religious reasons that the affidavit must be removed from the case record, Ricco said.

In the July 11 court filing, the defendant maintained that a US prosecutor and a team of FBI agents had overseen his questioning in Nairobi during a 12-day period in August 1998. Odeh added that the Americans occasionally left him alone with Kenyan interrogators “who threatened to torture and kill me”.

“I felt I had no choice but to sign the paper giving up my rights,” Odeh told trial Judge Leonard Sand in the July 11 court filing.

The Kenya embassy in Washington would not respond specifically to Odeh’s allegations. But in a written statement, the embassy conceded that some Kenyan law enforcement personnel had been implicated in abusive treatment of detainees.

The Kenya Constitution expressly prohibits subjection of any person to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment, the embassy said. The government does not condone torture or other ill treatment of individuals, it added.

Odeh’s questioning in Nairobi began after he was flown there from Pakistan following a week-long interrogation in that country. He had been arrested upon arrival at an airport in Pakistan on Aug. 7, 1998, the day of the twin embassy attacks. No Americans were present during his seven days of questioning by Pakistani authorities, Odeh said in the affidavit.

During his detention in Pakistan, according to this week’s affidavit, Odeh was similarly “subjected to violence, threats of torture, psychological coercion, sleep deprivation, and other inhumane conditions.”

A spokesman for the Pakistani embassy in Washington was more explicit than the Kenyans in denying Odeh’s allegations. They are false and baseless, a Pakistan press attacheÚ told The New York Times.

Along with the five other men held in New York in connection with the embassy blasts, Odeh has previously pleaded not guilty to all charges. If convicted, he will face a term of life imprisonment. United States prosecutors had considered seeking the death penalty against Odeh, but have reportedly decided to bring capital charges against only two of his co-defendants.

The withdrawal of Odeh’s complaints of torture at the hands of Kenyan and Pakistani interrogators suggests that the admissions he made in the aftermath of the bombings will be admitted in court as evidence against him.

He is alleged by US prosecutors to have confessed to involvement in the attacks as well as to membership in al Qaeda, the international terrorist network commanded by Osama bin Laden.

masthead